Tuesday’s match was regarded as the pick of the European Championships qualifiers this week – Italy, one of the great powers of world football versus Serbia, a nation with increasing stock within the game. Perhaps, had Serbia won, pundits might have looked back on their visit to Genoa as a changing of the guard, a transfer of superiority in line with the trend within international soccer towards Eastern Europe, in line with the strong tournament performances of Russia, Turkey, Greece and Croatia of recent years. However, the Serbian supporters who made the journey had no intention of allowing such an event to take place. Fuelled by a range of factors, from the obvious – alcohol, drugs and anger – to the abstract – rabid nationalism, hooligan hierarchies and domestic football politics – they laid waste to their enclosure within the Luigi Ferraris Stadium and forced the abandonment of the match after just seven minutes. They brought wire-cutters to break the barriers off the away supporters area, they brought hammers to break the plexiglas seperating them from the pitch, and they brought flares. Oh, they brought flares.
This was not a football riot in the traditional sense. The Serbian supporters did not come to fight, they came to make a statement – to the Italians, to their government, to the Serbian Football Association, to Europe. The history of hardcore football supporters in the Balkans is littered with big political statements, and the role of hooligans in political life is one which cannot be ignored. In 1990, a match between Red Star Belgrade (who provided the bulk of those in Genoa) and Dinamo Zagreb provided the short term stimulus which brought down Yugoslavia. The circumstances were volatile, and forces within both the Croatian and Serbian nationalist movements took their opportunity to split wide open the ailing state, using hooligans as their weapon. 3,000 Red Star fans travelled to Zagreb’s crumbling Maksimir Stadium, lead by the notorious criminal Željko Ražnatović, better known as Arkan. They were met by 19,000 home supporters, and the riot that ensued irrevocably ended the harmony that Tito had worked so hard to forge. The hooligans, however, did not just fight at the football. They took their fight from the terraces to the battlefield. Arkan’s Tigers, comprised of Red Star supporters, became one of the most feared units of the Serbian forces; Croat soldiers marched beneath Dinamo flags and with Dinamo insignia. Both clubs have monuments at their stadiums which commemorate the riot of May 1990, and cite it as the start of the war, the Gavrilo Princip moment.
The political undertones of football hooliganism in the Balkans however, are not accidental. There are forces within Serbia (and Croatia) which seek violence and use the hooligans, the angry, under-employed youth, to their own ends. The riot in Genoa, as in Zagreb , and as in most riots, was a consequence of disillusion and alienation. The Serbian situation is that of decline. The country is racked by unemployment, racism and economic decline. As their anthem played on Tuesday night, their supporters jeered, and produced a banner which read “Kosovo is Serbia”. Later, they burnt an Albanian flag. Last Saturday, a gay pride march was attacked by homophobic protestors, some carrying Serbian flags and Orthodox icons, but others clad in black, who had brought petrol bombs and other explosives with the express intention of causing a riot.
Football politics were also evident. Former national team coach, ex-Barcelona and Real Madrid (and Luton Town) legend Raddy Antic, who had lead the team at the World Cup was sacked due to a personal disagreement with Tomislav Karadzic, a move whih angered many supporters. The team’s goalkeeper, Vladimir Stojković, a former Red Star player, had committed the cardinal sin in the eyes of the predominantly Red Star-supporting hooligans, by moving to deadly rivals Partizan Belgrade – he was attacked by supporters before the game. In their previous match, Serbia had lost to minnows Estonia, and sit second bottom of their qualifying group, only the Faroe Islands below them. The Serbian fans were determined to vent their anger, and Italy was the ideal place to do it.
Italy is the home of the ultra – the hardcore style of support that is prevalent in Continental Europe. Ultras adhere to a certain method of support, based around constant noise and choreography on the terraces, and is by and large peaceful, but in certain areas it has been fused with the more British firm style of support, which has been mythologised by supporters on the continent through films such as The Firm, Green Street and The Football Factory. The Serbian hooligans practice the violent, often racist and certainly anti-social aspects of traditional British football hooliganism, but use the materials and tactics – banners, flares, the corteo (mass march to the game from the city centre) – of the Italian ultras.
The Serbian supporters arrived determined to make a statement in the heartland of the ultra, and they did. They came to show their own team, their own Football Association and their own government that they were still a force to be reckoned with, and they did. But it is not the fotoball hooligans who will benefit from their own actions; it is their masters, the shady figures who still wield considerable influence within their circles – the ultra-nationalists, the hardliners, the old guard from the Milosevic era. The Serbian players approached their own supporters and gave them the three fingers salute heavily associated with the right-wing Serbian Renewal Movement – derived from the manner in which Serb Orthodox Christians make the sign of the cross. The supporters responded in kind. The riot in the Luigi Ferraris Stadium was not a football riot – it was a riot that happened at a football stadium. There were factors far beyond the scope of sport, and these are to be focussed on and thought of in context of bruised nationalism in the aftermath of Montengrin and Kosovan secession, in context with the alienation and redundancy of young Serbian masculinity, and in context of the political actors within Serbia who appeared to be able to use these hooligans at will, and who represent the root of the violence in Genoa.